Tag Archive for 'Brause'

Victory for German Home School Family

Zittau, Germany—The IHRG is pleased to announce that the Brause family, a German home school family, that has lived under the cloud of criminal charges for the past couple of years has been redeemed.  German officials accused the parents of criminal child neglect for the home schooling their children.

 

On December 2nd we received word from our German counsel in this case, Johannes Hildebrandt, that the court and the prosecutor are dropping the charges against Mr. and Mrs. Brause.  This means they no longer face up to 2 years in prison and the potential loss of their children.  The decision of German officials is a huge victory for this family and for home school families in Germany.

 

Joel Thornton, President and General Counsel for the IHRG, said “we are pleased that the court and the prosecuting counsel asked whether the process can be ended.  This comes after the court received a detailed psychiatric report that there is no psychological harm to the children from home schooling.  The report stated that the children have not been harmed which is evidenced by their exit exams from high school.

 

“Now the Brause family may choose whether they want to have a sentence of acquittal in a public meeting in court or a document issued that declares the process closed and the charges dropped.

 

“This is a huge victory for home school families in Germany.  It means that government officials must be more careful when bringing criminal charges against home school families.”

 

Case History:

 

Since 2001, Bert Brause and his wife have taught their 8 children at home. Bert has studied Math and will soon be a certified teacher. The Brause’s live on a farm near the

 

 Polish and Czech Republic borders. Bert wrote a letter to the governor of Saxony asking for permission to home school his children. The state authorities in Saxony tried to force the parents to register their children in the public school. (There are no alternative schools close-by).

 

The Brause’s received threats and fines. Eventually, the social youth workers and, later, the court-ordered child defendant testified that the children were taught well and that they had a positive impression of them. Regardless of these findings, the Family Court ruled against the parents in Spring 2007. The custody for the school-aged children was partially taken from the parents and given over to the state. Under this ruling the parents had no say concerning school matters and where the children live. The children could be taken by the state authorities anytime. Just before the end of school in 2008 the parents received an ultimatum. The government had registered the children in school. If the children were not sent to school within 3 weeks, the authorities would take action. Regardless of this ruling the children remained in the home under the threat of removal at any time.

 

Then the state prosecutor ordered a hearing of the parents whom they charge with a criminal offense based on a law that requires intentional harming of a child, punishable with up to 2 years in prison.

 

The court set a trial date for 24 July 2008.  This was a criminal trial on the charge of intentional child neglect.  This trial was postponed after the IHRG announced its intention to bring in experts from America and England to testify as to the positive results of home schooling there.  The trial strategy also called for international human rights monitors to attend the hearing. 

 

Criminal charge: Intentional child neglect – Mr. and Mrs Brause were charged with willingly, knowingly preventing their children from going to school. Preventing the child from receiving a school education is considered harmful to the well being of the children.

 

The two oldest homeschooled children, aged 18 and 16, completed their public school exams successfully. Being homeschooled, they took advantage of the school law which permits “school exams for external students”. The Brauses want a regular school diploma for all their children so they can attend university after high school. They clearly informed the school authorities about their vision for their children.

 

Mr. and Mrs. Brause are Christians and homeschool their children for reasons of parental responsibility before God and the law. They chose to home educate their children for their best interest.

 

The IHRG will continue to work with the Brauses and other German home school families to make sure they can return to a normal life, home schooling their children as they have from the beginning of their children’s schooling.

 

A Partial Victory In Germany

We have just received a partial victory in Germany.  The Brause family home schools their children for religious reasons—they disagree with much of the anti-Christian curriculum in the sex education, science, and new age religion areas.  They have stood on their Christian principles and they have paid dearly for it.

 

Nearly two years ago the Youth Welfare Office went to court and had the custody of the two youngest Brause children taken from the parents the purposes of where the children live.  This means that any time the Youth Welfare Office decides to they can come to the Brause home and remove these two children.

 

The only solution for the Brauses, short of winning a court victory, is to surrender their principles and place their children in the public schools.

 

Until today the Brause parents were scheduled to have their day in court on July 24.  They have been charged with “intentional child neglect.”  The sole evidence proving this criminal claim is that they home school.  That is right, German officials consider home schooling to be child neglect because the parents are failing to educate the children in the location German officials consider proper.  This, in spite the fact that Germans working abroad for the government are encouraged to home school.

 

It is an interesting concept to think that a German family, in German, is neglecting their children when they are doing what the government encourages their own employees to do.

 

This is an incredible double standard!

 

Today the court has indefinitely postponed the case.  The reason, an attorney representing the Brause parents on behalf of the International Human Rights Group, in a legal brief filed last week, seems to have convinced the court that the prosecution has not presented enough facts to prove their case.

 

So, the court has postponed the hearing and we see this as a partial victory for the family.  After all, the children are still at home and the parents are still home schooling them.

 

Please continue to pray for this family as they stand strong against educational tyranny!